Categories
Insurance Disputes

Why Preparing for an Examination Under Oath (EUO) is Critical?

Preparing for an Examination Under Oath is probably the most important process, other than simply showing up. The lawyers that are hired have taken thousands and thousands of Examinations Under Oath over the years. They know what they’re looking for. They know what they’re asking – to create issues, so that your claim can potentially be denied. And so, preparing for the EUO is a process by which the Gilbert Firm is able to sit down with the insured, and work through the issues in their claim, talk about those issues, and explain what exactly is being asked by the insurance company. Not understanding a question that is asked by the insurance company’s attorney is the most dangerous thing that can happen, because the response that you give, while truthful, may give the wiggle room the insurance company wants when they’re looking to deny your claim.

What is an Examination Under Oath?

When you sustain a loss and make a claim with your insurance company for damages, you might be asked to submit to an Examination Under Oath, or EUO. If you’re asked, you have to say “yes,” or you risk having the claim denied altogether.

While the EUO is supposed to be used as a vetting tool for “suspicious” claims, more and more policyholders are being asked to submit. That’s why it is critical that you sit down with an experienced Tennessee insurance dispute attorney and go through the process first. The questions you’ll be asked can be really specific, because insurers want to avoid paying claims whenever they can. Preparing for the EUO can help ensure that you are compensated for the loss you sustained.

The Gilbert Firm fights on behalf of policyholders throughout the state. If you have been asked to submit to an Examination Under Oath, working with a skilled Tennessee insurance disputes attorney like Clint Scott, Brandon McWherter or Jonathan Bobbitt may be the difference between having your claim accepted or having it denied. To learn more about our services, or to schedule a consultation at one of our offices serving Nashville, Chattanooga, Jackson, Memphis or Knoxville, please call 888.996.9731 or fill out this contact form.

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Want a Purple House? Better Ask the HOA, Lest You Lose Your Insurance

Want a Purple House? Better Ask the HOA, Lest You Lose Your InsuranceWe recently ran across a news story out of Denver about a dispute between a homeowner and her homeowners’ association (HOA), over a particularly bright green paint. At the very end of the piece, the writer mentions that “the clock is ticking for [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][the homeowner] … who is in danger of losing her homeowner’s insurance. She has until the end of the month to get her house painted before her insurance is canceled.”

It may seem strange that a person could lose her homeowners’ insurance because of a poor paint choice, but it could conceivably happen. If you live in a condo, a multi-family home or a community where the HOA provides some level of insurance, and you are found in violation of an HOA regulation, that could affect your insurance policy. What we want to focus on here, though, is the importance of purchasing your own individual policy to protect you in the event of a problem.

HOA insurance and individual policies

More often than not, HOAs carry a master policy, often called a “walls out” or “studs out” policy, that can protect both the homeowner and the complex in the event of a fire or a storm (for example). The master policy would cover damage to things like:

  • Foundations
  • Elevators
  • Stairs and stairwells
  • Roofs
  • Hallways
  • Community areas (like the pool or clubhouse)
  • Landscaping

The master policy is likely to exclude flood damage, because flood damage is often excluded from insurance policies.

Everything else – “walls in” – may not be covered, which leaves you on the hook for costs. For example, if a recent storm caused a leak in the roof, and rainwater damages the electrical wiring inside of your home, the HOA’s insurance should cover the costs associated with fixing the leak and the writing. But the toaster or microwave that shorts out as a result? That may not be covered by the HOA policy; you may need your own policy to collect for that type of damage. Insurance policies come in all shapes and colors, which is why it is important for you to have the right policy.

And if you do want to paint your house, make sure it is a color that your HOA will not object to you using.

At the Gilbert Firm, we understand that disputes often arise between homeowners and insurance companies. We understand the importance of identifying whose insurance is primary, and we know how to fight to protect our clients when they make claims for damage. To schedule a consultation with a Tennessee insurance dispute attorney like Clint Scott, Brandon McWherter or Jonathan Bobbitt, please call 888.9996.9731, or fill out our contact form. With offices serving Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville, we are always nearby when you need us.[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Tennessee Shakes as Oklahoma Quakes – Time to Review Your Policy

Tennessee Shakes as Oklahoma Quakes – Time to Review Your PolicyOur neighbor two states over had an earthquake on Saturday: several of them, actually. One quake reached a 5.6 magnitude, and the effects could be felt in Memphis and Chicago. Tennessee is not usually a hotbed of serious earthquake activity, but that could be changing: we have had 11 in the first 13 days of September, the strongest of which was a 3.4 outside Tiptonville. Some experts believe we are due for a massive earthquake along the New Madrid Fault Line – the type of quake that could wipe out West Tennessee for up to two years.

Weather events have caused a lot of damage here at home and to our neighbors over the last few years, and homeowners may be surprised by what their policies do not cover. Now is the time to review your policy for exclusions, and to consider purchasing additional insurance to cover you in the event of a problem.

Common exclusions in homeowner policies

You can buy two different types of insurance policies: all-risk, which covers every scenario except those that are specifically excluded, or named peril, which covers nothing but those perils named in the policy. An all-risk policy is, in our opinion, the better option, but you may need to buy additional plans in order to cover damage caused by:

  • Water does a tremendous amount of damage, and Tennessee has seen an increased number of flash floods over the past couple of years. If you bought a home in a flood zone, chances are good that you had to purchase additional flood insurance right away – but if you weren’t required to buy it, now is the time to see if A) you need it, B) if it’s covered in your current policy (though it likely is not), and C) whether or not you can buy an additional plan to cover flooding.
  • Sewer backups. If you have a septic system, you probably don’t have to worry about sewers – but a backup can do untold amount of damage to your home and your property. Talk to your agent about adding a rider for sewer issues, just in case.

Any of these things on their own would be bad enough – but when you mix in an earthquake, the chances of drainage problems, flooding and bursting pipes increases. If you do not have additional earthquake coverage, an insurance company might try to deny your claim because of something called “anti-concurrent causation.” Basically, if you sustain damage to your home because of two separate causes, and one of those events is not covered by your policy, your insurer might attempt to deny the entire claim.

There’s a lot more to insurance than simply writing the monthly check, so we urge you to review your policies now. If you submitted a claim to your insurance company and they denied it unjustly or unfairly, you may have legal recourse available to you. The Tennessee insurance dispute attorneys of the Gilbert Firm have the experience and skills to help policyholders whose claims have been wrongly denied. Please contact Jonathan Bobbitt, Brandon McWherter or Clint Scott to find out more. You can contact the firm through our form, or call 888.996.9731 to schedule a consultation in one of our offices serving Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson or Knoxville.

Categories
Bad Faith Insurance Disputes

When Do You Really Need an Attorney for Your Insurance Claim Dispute?

When Do You Really Need an Attorney for Your Insurance Claim Dispute?The whole point of homeowners’ insurance is to protect you in the event of damage to your home. Whether there was a fire, or a flood, or wind damage, etc. – you call your agent, he or she helps you make a claim, and then you get paid out so you can fix your home. Should be easy enough.

But there are times when things do not move so smoothly, and that is when you might need an insurance dispute attorney to help you. When the insurance company is playing fast and loose with your contract, or attempting to deny your claim for unjust or suspicious reasons, that is when you should call a lawyer and ask for help. If you are unsure whether or not you have a right to act, call us anyway; it is better to be safe than sorry.

Good reasons to call

  1. Your insurance company is trying to get out of paying for damages that are covered under your policy.
  2. Your property has been assessed below its value, so your carrier can pay you less for your losses.
  3. Your claim has been flagged for “causation,” as in, they claim the damage was caused by something not covered by your policy (like “wear and tear”) when, in fact, it was caused by something covered under your policy.
  4. Your agent sold you the wrong policy, failed to properly explain what you were getting, did not pass along your claim to the underwriter, or committed some other act of negligence which led to the delay or denial of your claim.
  5. The insurance company or its employees acted in bad faith to avoid paying your claim.

In our experience, we have worked with a lot of people who were reluctant to call an attorney – even when their carriers had offered them an unfair pay out, or tried to “bully” them into accepting less or nothing at all – because they assumed their agents were telling the truth, or because they had difficulties parsing all the legal language in their contracts. Even a small sum is better than no money, they might have thought.

But you pay for your insurance policy month after month, year after year. And you have a right to fair and just compensation for structural and property damages to your home when something happens that is covered under your policy. If you believe your carrier is trying to pull the wool over your eyes, so to speak, the best thing you can do is call a Tennessee insurance dispute attorney. You could be entitled to far more than your insurance company is offering to pay.

The Gilbert Firm provides comprehensive, proactive counsel to victims of bad faith and agent negligence in Tennessee. To schedule a consultation with Clint Scott or Brandon McWherter, please call 888.996.9731. You can also use our contact form to reach a Tennessee insurance dispute lawyer from our firm. The Firm has offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville for your convenience.

Categories
Bad Faith Insurance Disputes

Making a Claim of Bad Faith against Your Insurer in Tennessee

Making a Claim of Bad Faith against Your Insurer in TennesseeWhen you purchase an insurance policy – homeowners, auto, commercial, etc. – you do so assuming that your insurance company will act in good faith and honor the claims you make, provided that claim is covered by the policies you have bought. When an insurer deliberately denies a claim for unjust reasons, you may be able to pursue a bad faith action.

We have discussed types of bad faith actions before, so now we would like to break down what the law says. You can read the statute in its entirety here, but this is what you need to know:

  1. The insurer has 60 days from when you, as the policyholder, have made a demand for payment on your covered loss to pay that claim. Unless the insurer refuses to pay the claim within that time, you cannot file a lawsuit for bad faith before that 60 days has passed.
  2. There must be a formal demand for payment. There has been a ton of litigation over the years concerning what constitutes “formal demand.” The best practice is to simply advise the insurer, in writing, of your intent to pursue a claim for bad faith if the claim is not appropriately and timely paid. Documenting this demand will help avoid future problems.
  3. The reason for the denial of payment must have occurred in bad faith. If your claim is denied because of a valid reason – like lack of coverage, for example – then you cannot pursue a bad faith action. However, an insurer’s unreasonable coverage denial can be bad faith if its interpretation of the policy is clearly flawed.

As insurance dispute lawyers, we handle bad faith actions regularly. We review claims weekly to help our clients determine if their claim has been denied or underpaid in bad faith. We also handle formal demands, to ensure that they are done correctly and in a timely fashion.

Compensation for a bad faith claim

Generally speaking, a successful bad faith action will allow a policyholder to recoup his or her losses, as well as compensation worth up to 25% “on the liability for the loss; provided, that it is made to appear to the court or jury trying the case that the refusal to pay the loss was not in good faith, and that the failure to pay inflicted additional expense, loss, or injury including attorney fees upon the holder of the policy or fidelity bond; and provided, further, that the additional liability, within the limit prescribed, shall, in the discretion of the court or jury trying the case, be measured by the additional expense, loss, and injury including attorney fees thus entailed.”

Policyholders in Tennessee may have additional recourse for punitive damages in some instances. Specifically, if an insurance company’s breach of its obligations under an insurance policy are “intentional, malicious, reckless, or malicious,” then the jury may award punitive damages. Importantly, punitive damages are not limited to 25% of the claim like the bad faith statute. See Carroll v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Company, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73674 (W.D. Tenn. June 8, 2015).

If you are unsure whether your insurance company has acted in bad faith, it is time to turn to the Gilbert Firm. Brandon McWherter and Clint Scott help Tennessee policyholders recover what is theirs when the insurance company unfairly denies their claims. To speak with a skilled insurance dispute attorney about your case, please call 888.996.9731 or fill out our contact form. We maintain offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville for the convenience of our clients throughout the state.

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Learning Lessons from Zenefits

Learning Lessons from ZenefitsIn 2013, a small company called Zenefits opened offices in New York and California. Over the past three years, it spread throughout the country. Zenefits, according to its own website, “integrates all of [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][a company’s] HR functions into an easy-to-use online dashboard;” in layman’s terms, the company sells cloud-based software that helps small to medium sized businesses manage their human resources departments. As part of the package, it also helps employers “manage all aspects of employee insurance online.”

This last part, about the insurance management, is what concerns us – specifically because in July, the state of Tennessee fined Zenefits $62,500 for violating insurance requirements. In a statement picked up by Reuters, Julie Mix McPeak, commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance, claimed “Under the company’s past leadership, compliance with insurance laws and regulations was almost an afterthought.”

Zenefits violated licensing rules here in Tennessee, and looks to have done the same in seven other states. The CEO, Parker Conrad, allowed his sales teams to act as insurance brokers, which means they were, essentially, selling insurance without a license. Buzzfeed reports that Tennessee regulators found “65 examples of employees selling insurance or otherwise acting as a broker in that state without a local license,” and 10 where the employees had no license at all.

Parker has since been let go, and the company has reported all potential licensing issues. They have also started requiring their brokers to finish 52 hours’ worth of coursework and instituted a new system to track compliance.

This story was an interesting one to watch develop, because the policies themselves were never called into question. But purchasing a policy from an unlicensed broker – one who is likely unable to explain any gaps in your coverage, or potential pitfalls you might face when making a claim – is a serious problem. If something goes wrong, or if the policy does not deliver what it promises, you may have a claim for broker negligence.

At the Gilbert Firm, we provide comprehensive counsel to policyholders and employers who have been harmed by such practices. To schedule an appointment with Tennessee insurance disputes attorney Clint Scott or Brandon McWherter, please call 888.996.9731 or fill out our contact form. We maintain offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville for your convenience.

 [/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Categories
Bad Faith Insurance Disputes

Burning Down the House: Arson and Homeowners’ Insurance in Tennessee

Burning Down the House- Arson and Homeowners’ Insurance in TennesseeIn our piece about homeowners’ policy exclusions, we listed “intentional acts” as one of the more common exclusions. Arson – the deliberate act of setting fire to a property – will normally fall under “intentional acts.” Insurance policies almost always cover fire, but there’s a huge difference between a grease fire in the kitchen and deliberately setting your own home aflame.

Under normal circumstances, if you set fire to your house, pay someone else to set fire to your house, or are in any way involved with the intentional burning down of your house, your claim will be denied. However, if someone sets fire to your home and you have no knowledge of the act, your insurance carrier should pay out on that claim.

Proving arson

Generally speaking, an insured is the party who must prove that the loss falls within the parameters of the policy, but the insurance company is responsible for proving arson. In other words, a policyholder must only show that a fire loss occurred during the term of the policy, and then the burden shifts to the insurance company to prove it doesn’t owe for the claim, i.e., arson. This can make it more complicated for policyholders to obtain a payout when their property has been deliberately burned by someone else.

In 2013, Brandon McWherter and Clint Scott represented clients whose insurance company denied their fire damage claim under a policy that insured against “accidental” direct physical loss. The insurance company claimed that the clients had committed arson and that the clients had the burden of proving the fire was “accidental” pursuant to the terms of the insurance policy. Proving a negative (that they didn’t burn it) can be different, but fortunately the Judge disagreed and ruled that policyholders only have to prove a fire occurred, and then the burden shifts to the insurance company to prove arson. When the case went to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the Court pointed out that it is presumed in Tennessee that “the burning of a property is the result of an accidental cause,” and that because someone else set fire to their home, they “accidentally” suffered a loss. This decision upheld the long-standing rule that insurance companies must prove arson occurred.

Additional complications

A story of California from 2012 highlights a particular type of complication that can arise out of an arson claim. A couple is on the verge of divorce and the wife wanted to remain in the family home. The husband set fire to that home, completely destroying it. The wife submitted a claim, which traditionally would have been denied; you cannot collect on a claim if the act was intentional, after all. But in this case, the wife was deemed an “innocent co-insured” and she was able to collect on her claim because of the wording of her policy.

This is one reason why more and more insurance companies are changing the language of their policies, to ensure that they will not have to pay out a claim if the intentional act was committed by “any” or “an” insured (as opposed the “the” insured, which can be interpreted differently).

The vast majority of homeowners do not expect someone to set fire to their property, intentionally or otherwise. Still, it is an excellent idea to review your policies with your agent and a skilled Tennessee insurance disputes attorney before you sign anything. At the Gilbert Firm, we uphold the rights of policyholders throughout the state and assist clients whose claims have been denied for unfair or unjust reasons. To work with an experienced Tennessee bad faith attorney from our firm, please call 888.996.9731, contact Brandon McWherter or Clint Scott, or use this contact form to schedule a consultation at one of our office locations in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson or Knoxville.

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Are You Covered for That Commercial Building You Just Purchased?

Are You Covered for That Commercial Building You Just Purchased?Commercial property is, by and large, pretty expensive. For many small business owners, buying a piece of property that hasn’t budged on the market for a while can look like a good bargain, since you are more likely to negotiate a better selling price. All of that is well and good, until a pipe springs a leak or the ceiling caves, or you find some other damage that leaves you at a loss.

When you purchase a building that has been unoccupied for an extended period of time, you must purchase an insurance policy that fits your needs, and understand what is and is not covered in that policy.

We have discussed exclusions before, but the average exclusions for a policy may differ when it comes to commercial property. This is also true for buildings that have been abandoned or vacant for more than 60 days. Your policy may not cover you for:

  • Previously damaged areas. While no insurance policy is going to cover you for damage that already exists, your policy may have a clause that allows it to deny claims if the damaged property, once fixed, becomes damaged again. For example, let us say there is a leak in one pipe in the building. You fix the pipe and the damage to the supports and dry wall, and then find that another leak springs up in the same exact place. Your policy may not cover that claim, since the damage occurred again.
  • Animal damage. It is unlikely that an insurance policy covers the mice that chew your wires, or any other examples of damage done by critters who have taken up residence in or around your building.
  • Electronic data. If you are the victim of a security breach, any data that is lost or stolen is may not be covered. You can purchase additional coverage for cyber security, and if you run any part of your business online, you absolutely should make that purchase.
  • Damage to the land. This is a tricky one for a lot of commercial property owners, but it works like this: when you buy a property, the land upon which your building sits might not be covered.

It is possible to purchase additional coverage for your property, and your agent should explain clearly and carefully what types of coverage you need. For example, if you buy a building in a flood zone and your agent fails to disclose that you need flood insurance, you may be able to make a case for an agent negligence claim. Before you buy any property, though, you should sit down with your agent to talk about your needs, and to ensure that your policy is sound.

The Gilbert Firm upholds the rights of policyholders throughout the state. If you believe your insurance agent acted negligently, or if your claim has been denied under what appears to be suspicious or unfair reasons, you’ll need a skilled Tennessee bad faith attorney to help you. Please call 888.996.9731, contact Clint Scott or Brandon McWherter, or use our contact form to schedule your consultation at one of our offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson or Knoxville to find out more.

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Mandatory Arbitration? Time to Check Your Policy

Mandatory Arbitration? Time to Check Your PolicyThere is a dangerous new issue in the insurance world regarding arbitration clauses. Though most insurance policies usually do not have forced arbitration clauses, recent news from Texas makes it apparent that at least some carriers are trying to go that route. As Tennessee is one of the many states with no statutes in place “prohibiting or restricting the use of arbitration in insurance contracts,” it is possible that your insurer may try to put one in place eventually.

When you purchase your policy, you agree to pay a certain premium for insurance coverage. This guarantees (at least hypothetically) that your insurer will provide coverage in the event of a claim. So if you submit a claim under your homeowners’ policy after a storm damages your home, and your insurance carrier refuses to pay, or tries to pay you less than what the damage is worth, then you could come see one of our attorneys, and we would either negotiate a better settlement, or take the insurer to court. It depends on the exact circumstances of your case. Either way, you are well within your legal rights to choose either of these options.

But those premiums can be difficult to pay – especially when you have a mortgage payment on top of it – for some homeowners. The insurance company then offers you another option: lower premiums in exchange for agreeing to arbitration in lieu of a right to a jury trial should a dispute arise. With a mandatory arbitration clause, however, you are denied your right to pursue justice in court. While arbitration can sometimes be used to reach a successful resolution, it also subjects the parties to a final decision that cannot be appealed under most circumstances.

The effect on homeowners

Remember how we said that homeowners’ policies usually don’t contain these clauses? Texas Farm Bureau is trying to change that. In this letter to the Texas Commissioner of Insurance, David Mattax, The Office of Public Insurance Counsel asks the Commissioner to not approve the company’s Endorsement No. HO-802, “’Mandatory Mediation-Arbitration Endorsement’… for use in the Texas insurance marketplace.” Farm Bureau is trying to push through policies with mandatory arbitration clauses – even homeowners’ policies. Given Tennessee’s lack of regulation in the realm of arbitration clauses, homeowners here could see a similar push for arbitration by insurance companies as well. And as the insurance company is likely to be in charge of picking an arbiter, the chances are good that homeowners won’t get a fair shake if a dispute arises.

So far, this hasn’t been an issue in Tennessee, but the winds of change are blowing. Now is probably the right time to double check your insurance policies, to make sure that you understand everything they say. If you notice any discrepancies or changes to your policy that you never agreed to, speaking with a skilled Tennessee insurance attorney is a smart move.

The Gilbert Firm proudly represents policyholders throughout Tennessee. If you believe your insurance company is acting in bad faith, or that you have been sold a different policy than the one you agreed to buy, we may be able to help. Please contact Brandon McWherter, Clint Scott, or one of our offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson or Knoxville to learn more about our services.

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

What Good is Health Insurance if the Hospitals Don’t Bill It for Your Procedures?

What Good is Health Insurance if the Hospitals Don’t Bill It for Your Procedures?We all grumble a little bit about paying our insurance premiums, until we get hurt or sick – and then those premiums don’t seem so bad. HealthCare.gov tells us that the average cost of a 3 day stay in a hospital is about $30,000, or $10,000 a day. So when you are seriously injured or ill, knowing that your health insurance will pick up the majority of that cost can ease some of your worries.

Unless your health insurance never receives a bill from the hospital – which is exactly what happened to a young woman in North Carolina, and the reason we wanted to talk about a controversial insurance practice taking place in states across the country.

In sum, this is what happened. Jessica Mounce was rear-ended by another car, and she “flew to the other side of the highway” as a result, as she told WSOCTV. She went to the hospital, but the hospital never billed her health insurance company. Instead, they went after Jessica herself, even putting a lien against her and threatening her with collections.

To understand why the hospital is allowed to do this, you need to know more about balance billing.

How health insurance pays a hospital bill

Insurance policies vary from customer to customer, but one of the things they do have in common is how they work with hospitals and doctors. This is called “balance billing,” and in very, very general terms, it works like this.

Let us say that ABC Hospital charges $200 to fix a broken leg. XYZ Insurance Company tells the hospital that they would love to contract with them, but they are only willing to pay $150 for a broken Leg. ABC Hospital agrees. Then, XYZ Insurance company tells you that they will only pay (based on your policy) for 50% of the costs to fix your broken leg – in this example, $75. You agree to this.

You break your leg, go to ABC Hospital, who then bills XYZ Insurance Company for $150. XYZ covers $75, so the hospital bills you for the additional $75. In that way, the total cost of $150 is paid in full.

Now, if you’re wondering what happened to that other $50 – it’s gone. The insurance won’t pay for it, so hospitals are supposed to chalk that up as the cost of doing business; after all, by accepting the insurance and whatever the policy will pay, the hospital stands to gain more patients and thus more revenue.

What the hospital did instead

Instead of billing Jessica’s healthcare insurance provider, the hospital – looking to recoup all of its money – sought payment from the auto insurance carrier for the driver that hit Jessica, placing a lien on any settlement or recovery, and threatening to turn her over to collections. They never billed her healthcare provider at all. If it seems unfair, it is – but it also may be perfectly legal in most states. WSOCTV reports that there are lawsuits pending in similar cases in Colorado, Ohio, Missouri, Arkansas and North Carolina right now, and there could be more in other states, too. Indiana, on the other hand, has passed laws that prohibit hospitals from not going through a person’s healthcare insurance provider first.

We urge you to review both your health insurance and auto insurance policies to make sure you have enough coverage, and to make sure that your health insurance is billed for any medical treatment that you receive. At the Gilbert Firm, we protect policyholders at risk of being taken advantage of. To make an appointment with Clint Scott or Brandon McWherter, please call 888.996.9731, or fill out our contact form. With offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville, you can always find an experienced Tennessee bad faith attorney nearby when you need help.