Navigating the appropriate placement for a child with special needs can be difficult. Some educators or IEP team members may offer opinions on what they believe is “best” for the child, but not necessarily what is the least restrictive placement.
In the Supreme Court case of Endrew F. (2017), Justice Roberts wrote that children with disabilities cannot be “receiving instruction that aims so low [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][that it] would be tantamount to ‘sitting idly . . . awaiting the time when they were old enough to ‘drop out.’”
Often, the more challenging curriculum is found in the regular education classroom with non-disabled peers (a least restrictive placement). With supports and, in some cases, modifications to the curriculum, placement in the regular education classroom is not only possible, but highly desirable. Why? Because children with disabilities can learn not just from teachers, but from children without disabilities. They can emulate good behavior too.
But obstacles still exist. Some educators may believe that “small” or “more structured” classrooms, ones with “other children with disabilities,” are superior to the regular classroom environment. These classrooms often consist of children with disabilities only. They may be perceived as “best,” but they are “more restrictive,” not “least restrictive.”
While it is important to avoid generalizing, any perceived benefit from a more restrictive classroom should be assessed very closely. Ask whether any such benefit can be brought into the regular education classroom. Maybe it is a modified curriculum. Maybe it is a paraprofessional. Maybe it is some “pull out” time for 1:1 support. Can these perceived advantages be delivered in the regular education classroom too? If they can, the regular education classroom may be the appropriate placement.
For years, the United Kingdom offered parents of children with disabilities a choice of a classroom—a classroom for disabled-only students; or inclusion in the regular education classroom with supports. This allowed researchers to study how the two groups progressed.
Dr. Sue Buckley, of Down Syndrome Education International, reports that children with Down syndrome who were educated with their non-disabled peers averaged 3.3 years ahead in reading and 2.5 years ahead in expressive language than peers educated with disabled children only.
Again, every child is unique and careful individual considerations of the appropriate placement must be undertaken. However, parents should be aware of the power of the regular education environment with appropriate supports. Always ask whether one’s perception of “best” is also the “least restrictive.” If it’s not, consider asking whether any advantages of the more restrictive placement can be delivered in the regular classroom. That may provide the student the right placement while avoiding Justice Robert’s fear of them “sitting idly . . . [until] they are old enough to drop out.”
If you are the parent of a student with disabilities, and your child’s rights have been violated, you have legal options. At the Gilbert Firm, we advocate on behalf of students, so they can experience all the educational system has to offer. To speak with a skilled Tennessee special education attorney like Justin Gilbert, please call 888.996.9731, or fill out our contact form. The Firm maintains offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville, for your convenience.[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]